I like the Mark Cade approach but I am not sure if it is acceptable to SCEA evaluation team to club different implementation-level components into one component in analysis and design to simplify the UML diagrams. I mean it as a dedicated distributed component. By responsibility, I do not mean a single method in a typical definition of class of object oriented concepts. Dedicating one component to one responsibility will be most close to the actual implementation of the components. Clubbing is good in terms of showing them in UML diagrams but that does not match the actual implementation of components on one-on-one basis. However, ePractize mock exams only assign a single responsibility into one component.Įach of these styles are correct in their own ways. He clubs related actions into one component. In other words, he does not dedicate a component for each single action. Mark Cade clubs all user login related JSPs into one component, related actions related JSPs into different components. While preparing the class and component diagrams, I have seen that Mark Cade latest SCEA guide and ePracrtice exams follow different style. always comply with the assignment requirements on submission file name/type etc.). SysMLExamples.mdj - An example model including various SysML elements and diagrams. UMLExamples.mdj - An example model including various UML elements and diagrams. It was repeatable and the output file was always correct (i.e. StarUML-metamodel.mdj - A model representing StarUML metamodel which is StarUML actually based on. In my case, I wrote an ANT script to jar my output folder. The easiest way to zip them then change to jar extension. So you'll need to convert them to PNG or JPG. If I remember correctly, the assignment asks to have all diagrams in some image format and linked to a main html page. I did in mine assignment, there wasn't any problem. Should you contact Star UML support instead? Are there any standard steps for making the final jar? When we make the final jar, how to we include these so that examiner can open up these files? Do we need to covert these into PDF formats before making final JAR file?Ĥ. Star UML gives the uml extension to all the diagrams. What do you dislike about StarUML There are lots of features, first I dislike to see many things and try to find which is most appropriate for my app, after learning a bit detail I like its features. Is it ok do that in the assignment? Because, I am not sure if it would be 100% UML compliant to include nodes in a class / component diagrams.ģ. The sequence diagrams, class diagram, usecase diagram etc Review collected by and hosted on G2.com. As per Mark Cade diagrams, it is fine to include node elements in class diagram and component diagram even they are not pure classes / components. and I dont find any properties option with this version. How do we show arguments to the methods in sequence diagrams? Some one on this forum said that we need to go to properties of that diagram and enable name and type. In that process, I am having the following blocking issues. I am almost done with my writing of UML diagrams on paper and trying to convert the same into Star UML diagrams.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |